The companies winning this cycle never listed.
The two labs setting the pace have no ticker. Tokenized pre-IPO exposure is the only way a public-market buyer can hold them at all — and it comes with an issuer who can take it away.
Follow in this browser. Revisit Following for evidence updates and call results.
The time-bound call
Fixed at publicationThis basket will outperform the S&P 500 over 90 days.
- Started
- Deadline
- Last updated
How the call is scored
A fixed model basket versus SPYx, each initially quoted from $150 USDC. The original raw token quantities never rebalance. Returns compare their USDC sell quotes with the starting sell quotes. The call succeeds only if the basket's return is strictly higher. Equal returns are a tie. Resolution uses the first complete quote observation started on or after the deadline, within 48 hours. If that window has no valid observation, the result is unresolved. Quotes include route price impact but exclude wallet execution and network costs. These are model returns, not your investment results.
Prices come from live Jupiter quotes and refresh once a day. A price that looks unreliable is skipped rather than guessed.
The deadline only scores the idea. It never sells your holdings and pays no prize. A new version of the thesis starts a new call.
Quote source: Jupiter ↗The argument
Why this idea. Why these businesses.
Every listed AI basket is a bet on the suppliers and the buyers of compute, because the companies actually building the frontier models are private. That is a gap in what a public-market investor can express, not a judgement that the private companies are better businesses. PreStocks tokens close the gap: they reference economic exposure to OpenAI and Anthropic, and they settle on Solana against USDC like anything else in this catalogue. The listed leg is here to keep the basket honest — if the private names are mispriced by their own thin books, the supplier leg is the part with a public price to check them against.
Inside the basket
- 40%
OpenAI
The company most associated with this cycle and entirely inaccessible on a public exchange. Its token has the deepest book of the pre-IPO set, which is what makes a basket-sized position fillable at all.
The tradeoff. The issuer can freeze, claw back or compulsorily redeem this token at a price it sets, and its terms say that price may be nil. Its balance also carries a scaled-UI multiplier, so the displayed quantity is not the raw one.
About this tokenized stock
Underlying: OPENAI. Issuer: PreStocks. PreStocks issues these tokens. The issuer can freeze, claw back, burn or compulsorily redeem any holding at a price it sets, which its terms say may be nil, without notice, appeal or compensation. Every transfer pays a 0.5% fee it can raise at any time. You hold a reference to economic exposure, not shares: no shareholder rights and no claim on the assets behind it. Its terms prohibit US persons.
Issuer terms (opens in a new tab) - 35%
Anthropic
The second name in the same race, and the one whose revenue is weighted toward enterprise rather than consumer, so the two legs are not the same bet twice.
The tradeoff. Same issuer, same single key holding permanent delegate and freeze authority over it. Concentrating two of three holdings with one issuer is the concentration risk that matters here, and it is deliberate rather than overlooked.
About this tokenized stock
Underlying: ANTHROPIC. Issuer: PreStocks. PreStocks issues these tokens. The issuer can freeze, claw back, burn or compulsorily redeem any holding at a price it sets, which its terms say may be nil, without notice, appeal or compensation. Every transfer pays a 0.5% fee it can raise at any time. You hold a reference to economic exposure, not shares: no shareholder rights and no claim on the assets behind it. Its terms prohibit US persons.
Issuer terms (opens in a new tab) - 25%
NVIDIA
The one holding with a continuous public market behind it. It is here so the basket has a reference that cannot be set by the issuer of the other two.
The tradeoff. It is also the most widely held AI asset in the world, so it contributes little that a reader does not already own elsewhere.
About this tokenized stock
Underlying: NVDA. Issuer: Backed Finance. Backed Finance issues these tokens. The issuer can move tokens out of any wallet (permanent delegate) and can freeze all transfers (pausable). Balances rebase for dividends and splits, so your share count can change without a trade.
Issuer terms (opens in a new tab)
Why these weights. The listed leg is a quarter of the basket and is not a conviction weight — it is the only holding here with a public market price, and it is sized to be a reference point rather than a hedge. Between the two private names, the larger weight goes to the deeper book, because at this size liquidity is the difference between a position and a trap.
The strongest case against
The wrapper is the risk, and it is larger than the companies. The issuer holds permanent delegate, freeze and pause authority over both pre-IPO mints from a single key, and its terms reserve the right to claw back or compulsorily redeem a holding at a price it sets — which it says may be nil — with no notice and no appeal. There is no named legal entity behind it, no proof of reserves, and no confirmed retail redemption path. Every transfer pays a 0.5% fee the issuer can raise on tokens already held. On top of that the books are thin enough that the market price sits at a persistent premium or discount to the issuer's own reference price, so a buyer is not buying at net asset value. It is entirely possible to be right about OpenAI and Anthropic and still lose everything here.
What would change the thesis?
Any of: a public clawback, freeze or forced redemption of a holder's PreStocks position; the transfer fee being raised; or the market price staying more than 15% from the issuer's reference price for a month. Any one of those makes the wrapper, not the companies, the thing being traded.
Read the evidence. Make up your mind.
Sources supporting the idea, including the ones that challenge it.
- PreStocks Terms of Service (opens in a new tab)
PreStocks
The issuer's own statement of what it can do to a holding: freeze, claw back, burn, or compulsorily redeem at a value it determines, which it says may be nil, without notice or appeal. It also states that holders acquire no shareholder rights and no claim on the assets behind the token, and that US persons may not use the service. This is the primary risk in the basket and it is documented by the issuer, not inferred by us.
- PreStocks products and mint addresses (opens in a new tab)
PreStocks
The issuer's list of live tokens and their Solana mint addresses. Each mint in this basket was read from mainnet and its on-chain metadata symbol matched against this list before being allowlisted; the page is the cross-check, never the source of truth.
- OPENAI mint on Solana (opens in a new tab)
Solscan
The mint account itself, where the Token-2022 extensions can be read directly: permanent delegate, freeze authority, pausable config, the 0.5% transfer fee and the scaled-UI multiplier. Everything the counterargument claims about issuer power is verifiable here rather than taken on trust.
- ANTHROPIC mint on Solana (opens in a new tab)
Solscan
The second pre-IPO mint, carrying the same authorities under the same key as the first. This is the evidence for the concentration risk named in the weight rationale.
Updates and version history
An update appends dated evidence to this argument. A new version changes the argument or the allocation itself. Neither one touches a position you already hold.
No updates since publication. When the author adds one, it appears here with its date and its sources — it never changes what is written above.
- Version 1
e9dd626a6fCurrent
Written by the Thesis team. The team holds no position in these companies or their tokenized shares, and is paid nothing by any of them.
Tracking begins at publication. This thesis has no established performance history. Tokenized stocks carry issuer and market risk.